<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"  xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:photo="http://www.pheed.com/pheed/">
 <channel>
  <title>European Interreligious Forum For Religious Freedom</title>
  <description><![CDATA[EIFRF is an interfaith group, which Steering Committee includes religious leaders from various faiths and from various European countries, united in order to:
• Promote freedom of religion and belief
• Promote religious tolerance
• Promote interfaith dialog
• Promote knowledge of religions]]></description>
  <link>https://www.eifrf-articles.org/</link>
  <language>us</language>
  <dc:date>2026-10-18T01:58:27+02:00</dc:date>
  <geo:lat>48.8903273</geo:lat>
  <geo:long>2.3263728</geo:long>
  <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="alternate" href="https://www.eifrf-articles.org/xml/atom.xml" type="text/xml" />
  <item>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:https://www.eifrf-articles.org,2026:rss-63378883</guid>
   <title>Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities</title>
   <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 09:09:00 +0200</pubDate>
   <dc:language>us</dc:language>
   <dc:creator>EIFRF</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></dc:subject>
   <description>
   <![CDATA[
        <div style="position:relative; float:left; padding-right: 1ex;">
      <img src="https://www.eifrf-articles.org/photo/art/default/63378883-45700200.jpg?v=1648543665" alt="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" title="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" />
     </div>
     <div>
      <strong>A rapid history of FECRIS</strong> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  The <em>European Federation of Centres for Research and Information on Sects and Cults</em> (FECRIS) is a French-registered umbrella organization that gathers anti-cult associations all over Europe and beyond. It was created on June 30, 1994, by the French anti-cult association UNADFI (<em>National Union of Associations in Defense of the Individual and Families against Cults),</em> and registered at the very same address as UNADFI. It was created with the aim of coordinating the anti-cult movement at European level. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  It started with a representation in 10 different countries, and rapidly grew to attain 36 member organizations in 24 different countries in 2001. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  In&nbsp;2009,&nbsp;FECRIS&nbsp;was granted "ECOSOC&nbsp;Special Consultative Status" by the United Nations. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  In several countries, FECRIS member associations have been created by, or merged with, or have close links to State religions that uses them as a way to eliminate what they see as competitors. As said in <em>Freedom of Religion or Belief Anti-Sect Movements and State Neutrality A Case Study: FECRIS</em>, a collective academic book published by Lit Verlag, “FECRIS gathers associations with various, even contradictory, vested interests which see an opportunity to ally to fight against religious minorities.” The book gives examples: “France, the cradle of laïcité [<em>French secularism</em>] and the driving force of the anti-sect fight in Europe promoting the separation between State and religion; Austria and Germany, where public powers and dominant churches lead a common struggle against “sects”; and Serbia and Russia, two Orthodox countries in which FECRIS member associations include Orthodox missionary departments instrumentalizing the sect issue to eliminate competitors of Orthodox Churches.”<em> (<a class="link" href="https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/freedom-of-religion-or-belief-anti-sect-movements-and-state-neutrality-lit-verlag/1130380614">The book</a>)</em>
     </div>
     <br style="clear:both;"/>
     <div style="position:relative; float:left; padding-right: 1ex;">
      <img src="https://www.eifrf-articles.org/photo/art/default/63378883-45700201.jpg?v=1648543329" alt="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" title="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" />
     </div>
     <div>
      <strong>FECRIS in Russia</strong> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  The main representative of FECRIS in Russia is Russian Orthodox Theologian Alexander Dvorkin. In 1993, he founded the&nbsp;<em>Saint Irenaeus of Lyons Information and Advisory Center</em>, which is the chief organization of the RATSIR (Russian Association of Centers for the Study of Religions and Sects), itself an umbrella organization that gathers a great number of anti-cult associations, almost all linked with the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC), and often merged with it. The Center itself was blessed by Patriarch Alexy II, who, in March 2002, in a low-key ceremony, consecrated a church at the Lubianka headquarters of the Federal Security Bureau, which is the successor to the KGB, with a “ceremony focused on the need for concerted actions aimed at combating the current threats posed to Russia’s ‘spiritual security,’” as the Patriarch said. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Dvorkin’s organization joined FECRIS and changed its name into&nbsp;<em>Saint Irenaeus of Lyons Center for Religious Studies</em>&nbsp;in 2003. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  The Vice President of RATSIRS is Archpriest Alexander Novopashin and its Executive Secretary is Priest Alexander Kuzmin. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Novopashin is the rector of the St. Alexander Nevsky cathedral, in Novosibirsk, and head of the&nbsp;<em>Information and Advisory Center on Sectarianism</em>, a FECRIS member association which is located in the cathedral and whose assistants and ordinary employees are the priests of the cathedral. <em>(<a href="http://ansobor.ru/page.php?id=15" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Kuzmin, besides being a priest of the Russian Orthodox Church is the head of the&nbsp;<em>Saratov branch of the Center for Religious Studies</em>, a member association of RATSIR, located in Saratov. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  As stated in the already quoted book&nbsp;<em>Freedom of Religion or Belief Anti-Sect Movements and State Neutrality A Case Study: FECRIS,&nbsp;</em>in Russia the “concept of spiritual security has been used by Russian ideologues of the right and left”, and “Spiritual security, then, serves as the basis for a campaign based on paranoia of “foreign” enemies and “foreign” ideas, and for measures to unduly restrict freedom of religion or belief of Russian citizens who have decided to follow a non-consensual spiritual path. Members of the European Federation of Centres of Research and Information on Sectarianism (FECRIS) in Russia play prominent roles in this campaign and repressive policy.”
     </div>
     <br style="clear:both;"/>
     <div style="position:relative; float:right; padding-left: 1ex;">
      <img src="https://www.eifrf-articles.org/photo/art/default/63378883-45700218.jpg?v=1648543351" alt="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" title="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" />
     </div>
     <div>
      <strong>Fostering the crackdown on religious minorities in Russia</strong> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  As stated in the 2020 report for the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) called&nbsp;<em>The Anti-cult Movement and Religious Regulation in Russia and the Former Soviet Union</em>, FECRIS “regularly spreads negative propaganda about religious minorities, including at international forums like the annual Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Human Dimensions conference. Dvorkin’s SILIC (<em>Saint Irenaeus of Leon Information-Consultation Center</em>) is the primary associate of FECRIS in Russia and receives significant financial support from both the ROC and the Russian government.” <a class="link" href="https://www.uscirf.gov/publication/anti-cult-movement-and-religious-regulation-russia-and-former-soviet-union"><em>(The report)</em></a> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  The Russian members of FECRIS have been campaigning in Russia against &nbsp;movements they decide to label “destructive cults”. The list of targeted movements is quite long, but includes all movements that are seen as “foreign” and “non-traditional” religions: the Baptists, the Pentecostals, Jehovah Witnesses, Hindus, almost all Muslim groups that were not part of the officially recognized branch which is approved by the FSB, Scientologists, the Falun Dafa, the Church of the Latter Days Saints, etc. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  While the troubles for these religious or spiritual movements started in the late 90s, it should be noted that the real crackdown and the stiffening of the repression started after 2009. As mentioned in the USCIRF aforementioned report: “Dvorkin’s official influence increased significantly in the late-2000s. In 2009, he was appointed head of the Russian government’s Council of Experts, tasked with monitoring religious activity and approving legal registration. The Council was created in 1998 to help enforce the 1997 law. The amended law of February 18, 2009 expanded the Council’s reach, giving it authority over the activity, structure, and religious content of registered organizations alongside its oversight of the registration process.” <br />  &nbsp; <br />  It was exactly during this same time FECRIS held its annual international meeting in Saint-Petersburg. During the meeting (15-16 May 2009), the executives of FECRIS from all over Europe had private meetings with Russian Federation officials, including with Alexandr Konovalov, the Russian Minister of Justice (from 2008 to 2020) who was called “the hidden monk” for his allegiance to the ROC. They also met Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, S. M. Kazantsev. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  This was confirmed by Alexander Dvorkin himself, who wrote in a press release on behalf of his organization: “During the conference, the Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation A.V. Konovalov met with the leadership of FECRIS and the Rector of St. Petersburg State University N.M. Kropachev, which took place in the office of the latter. A similar meeting was also held in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, where a group of conference participants was received by Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation S. M. Kazantsev. During these meetings, the parties exchanged information and discussed ways to prevent the negative consequences of the activities of totalitarian sects.” <em>(<a class="link" href="https://iriney.ru/main/obyavleniya/totalitarnyie-sektyi.html" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> Novopashin also wrote on his website: “In addition to Alexander Dvorkin and prominent officials, our country was represented at the conference by Alexander Konovalov himself, who arrived on the second day of the event and held an hour-long meeting with the FECRIS management.” <em>(<a class="link" href="http://ansobor.ru/news.php?news_id=355" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  In what may be seen as a favor returned to the Russian authorities, that very same day Dvorkin was elected as vice-president of the FECRIS. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Since that date, things have escalated for religious minorities in Russia, culminating with the ban of the Jehovah Witnesses in Russia, declared by the Supreme Court as an “extremist group” which led to dozens, if not hundreds of jail terms for peaceful members since 2017. &nbsp;Not only the Jehovah Witnesses but many other movements had to face discriminatory measures and persecution against their members, due to the growing restrictions on freedom of religion or belief in the country, and the fierce repression in which the authorities have engaged over the last decade.&nbsp;
     </div>
     <br style="clear:both;"/>
     <div>
      <strong>Fueling anti West propaganda around the conflict with Ukraine</strong> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  The anti-west propaganda in Russia is certainly not a new topic, nor a FECRIS exception. Nevertheless, FECRIS definitely plays its part. The anti-West propaganda is based on the idea that foreign religions are influencing Russian society from inside, and therefore are against patriotic ideals. As stated in USCIRF 2020 report: “Echoing Putin’s concerns about spiritual and moral security, Dvorkin claimed in 2007 that NRMs deliberately “inflict damage on Russian patriotic feelings.” In 2010, he gave a lecture entitled “Totalitarian Sects as a Threat to National Security” to students at the Institute of the Federal Security Bureau (FSB)—the main successor to the Soviet-era KGB. In 2012, Putin claimed that “totalitarian sects” were “growing like mushrooms,” and “present[ed] a distinct threat to society” that needed to be addressed by legal mechanisms at both the local and federal levels.” <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Then, according to the same report, after Russia invaded Crimea: “Russia brought along its restrictive religious regulation framework when it invaded Crimea in 2014, including the symbiosis between anti-cult ideas and national security. The occupation regime in Ukraine frequently has used religious regulations to terrorize the general population”. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  In the Ukrainian pseudo-states Donetsk and Lugansk, controlled by pro-Russian separatists, just after the war started in 2014, a new “constitution” was proclaimed. It’s the only constitution in the world that makes “fighting cults” a constitutional principle. In Donetsk and Lugansk nowadays, the only authorized religion is the Russian Orthodox Church. Alexander Dvorkin is not a stranger in this, to the point that in 2014, Dvorkin had been invited by the Archbishop of Lugansk and Alchevsk Mitrofan (Ukrainian Orthodox Church/ Moscow Patriarchate) to give some lectures about “cults” on 9-10 April in Lugansk, and was denied entry in Ukraine at the airport of Donetsk and sent back to Russia.<em> (<a class="link" href="https://bitterwinter.org/donetsk-and-luhansk-denying-religious-liberty/">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  While the official reason justifying his deportation was that he had been seen with the wife of Gubarev, the self-proclaimed governor of Donetsk, it might also have to do with the numerous statements Dvorkin made in early 2014 about the “Maidan regime”, accusing elected politicians to be forwarding a Western agenda, and to belong to “dangerous cults”, as Greek Catholics, Baptists, Scientologists, Pentecostals, and even advancing the idea that the Pope Francis had adopted a pro-revolutionary Marxist attitude in support of the Maidan protests. <em>(<a class="link" href="https://www.europeantimes.news/2022/03/how-the-anti-cult-movement-has-participated-to-fuel-russian-anti-ukraine-rhetoric">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  These statements received extensive press coverage in Russia, and rapidly became part of the official storytelling on Ukraine in the Federation. In addition to this, Dvorkin, on behalf of FECRIS, accused the “neo-pagans” who were now in the government, to be neo-Nazis, a rhetoric that has continued until these very days whilst the war is ongoing, and are used by the Putin’s propaganda machine to justify the war in Ukraine.&nbsp;<em>(<a class="link" href="https://www.europeantimes.news/2022/03/how-the-anti-cult-movement-has-participated-to-fuel-russian-anti-ukraine-rhetoric">Source</a>)</em>
     </div>
     <br style="clear:both;"/>
     <div>
      <strong>Supporting the war against Ukraine</strong> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  FECRIS’ contribution to Russian propaganda against Ukraine continued until the war began, on February 24, 2022, when Putin’s armed force started to invade and&nbsp;bomb Ukraine. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Did it stop then? Not at all. In fact, all FECRIS groups in Russia have supported the war efforts and official Russian propaganda justifying the war. Echoes to the “Spiritual war against the Gay pride” (<a class="link" href="https://www.europeantimes.news/2022/03/moscow-patriarch-kirill-war-has-a-metaphysical-significance-against-gay-parade/">see here</a>) as promoted by ROC Patriarch Kirill can be found on all Russian FECRIS websites. Here are a few examples: <br />  &nbsp; <br />  On the FECRIS group&nbsp;<em>Saint Irenaeus of Lyons Center for Religious Studies’</em>&nbsp;website, on 20 March 2022, an interview of Roman Sylantev, a close colleague of Dvorkin in the fight against “cults”, was posted. In this interview, Sylantev praises the war, supporting the concept that “joint military operations” are the best vehicle to “strengthen friendship between people of different nations and faiths to the maximum”, and that because of war, “tension in the interreligious and interethnic spheres has significantly decreased in Russia”. For Sylantev, the war is also good because now “large commercial cults are leaving Russia”. <em>(<a class="link" href="https://iriney.ru/sektyi-i-kultyi/sektovedenie-/-obshhee/novosti-sektovedeniya-/-obshhee/s-nachalom-operaczii-na-ukraine-v-rf-zametno-snizilas-napryazhennost-v-mezhreligioznoj-sfere-ekspert.html" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  On Archpriest Alexander Novopashin’s website, which is at the same time the website of the Alexander Nevsky’s Cathedral in Novosibirsk and the one of the FECRIS group&nbsp;<em>Information and Advisory Center on Sectarianism</em>, you can find several interviews and articles published since the beginning of the war. One of them is dedicated to the position of Novopashin himself. Indeed, according to the article, “some forces maliciously distorted the meaning of his public statements” about “the events in Ukraine”. These forces, says the article, led people to believe that he “was really calling people to the streets to oppose the government”. Not at all, says Novopashin. This was “provocation” and lies. “I have a clear and convinced attitude towards Nazism as to Satanism”, he says, echoing the propaganda about “denazification” of Ukraine by the Russian army. “The ideology of Nazism must be destroyed - it is anti-human and has a satanic origin. Therefore, my attitude to the fight against Nazism is unequivocal ... I will never call anyone to the streets to defend evil.” Then, finally: “Any disease must be cured, and, alas, if a person has gangrene, you have to take away their hand, resort to surgical methods.” <em>(<a class="link" href="http://ansobor.ru/news.php?news_id=10479" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Another article on the website is an op-ed by a man called Serguey Komarov, who is presented as being of Ukrainian origin and has an interesting point of view on war. For him: “God allowed war to come” because it’s God’s punishment against Ukrainians. “And now this horror will have to go through not only Donbass, but the whole of Ukraine. When God's punishments come, they concern everyone - both the guilty and the innocent, both the bad and the good”, says Komarov. Then, adapting a biblical reference: “It doesn't matter who is an instrument in the hands of God. It is important that the Lord punished Israel for their iniquity by the invasion of different peoples and is able in our time to teach and punish peoples and countries in the same way. Biblical laws are eternal. Fascism is evil and will be punished by God. Fascism cannot be dealt with. It can only be destroyed. It's time for someone to pay the bills. Russia was left with no choice.” <em>(<a class="link" href="http://ansobor.ru/news.php?news_id=10475" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Another article on Novopashin’s website is op-ed by Protodeacon Vladimir Vasilik. Vasilik makes clear that we should not worry about war against Ukraine, “because in reality there is no Ukrainian statehood. There is, on the one hand, a gang of thieves and international speculators, and on the other hand, a gang of fanatics and murderers who speculate on the blood of the Ukrainian people.” For him, the Russian army is only furthering a mission of peacekeeping: “We will also pray for the Ukrainian servicemen to lay down their arms as soon as possible and, in cooperation with the Russian troops, establish peace… And may God help to grant peace in Ukraine as soon as possible through the hands of Russian peacekeepers, for which we all pray.” <a class="link" href="http://ansobor.ru/news.php?news_id=10446" rel="nofollow"><em>(Source)</em></a>
     </div>
     <br style="clear:both;"/>
     <div style="position:relative; float:left; padding-right: 1ex;">
      <img src="https://www.eifrf-articles.org/photo/art/default/63378883-45700239.jpg?v=1648543484" alt="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" title="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" />
     </div>
     <div>
      <strong>Acting with Russian law enforcement agencies to hunt peace advocate dissidents</strong> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  On the website antisecta.ru, belonging to the&nbsp;<em>Centre of Religious Studies – Saratov</em>, a FECRIS group headed by Alexander Kuzmin, Executive Secretary of RATSIR, we can find a very interesting call to denounce those who would forward ideas of “peace” against “war” in Ukraine. After having made clear that “the West” was behind an “information war” intended to “undermine human behavioral stability” by pretending that the Russian army would “bomb civilians” in Ukraine, or that there would be “dead conscripts” from the Russian army on the battlefield, Kuzmin launches a call of denunciation: “Please also help in monitoring the activities of such provocateurs. Please send screen shots, their designated data (names and surnames, phone numbers and e-mail addresses) for further analysis, which is conducted by our anti-sectarian organizations together with the law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation.” <em>(<a class="link" href="https://anticekta.ru/?p=6493" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  It's not the first time that FECRIS groups work hand in hand with law enforcement agencies, including the FSB and other secret services in order to denounce dissidents, but nowadays, with the ongoing war and the new law in Russia which penalizes anyone to be jailed for up to 15 years for “discrediting the armed forces” and/or pronouncing the word “war” instead of “special military operation”, this activity takes on its full significance.
     </div>
     <br style="clear:both;"/>
     <div>
      <strong>Anti-West propaganda as a general pattern</strong> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  The anti-West propaganda of FECRIS is not limited to nowadays, and not limited to Russia. Looking for support from countries that might see the “West” and especially the US with a quite negative view, FECRIS has relied on a narrative that is fueling a strong negative attitude toward democratic western values, a narrative made of a not unusual conspiracy theory – Western secret services use the “cults” to forward their agendas – capitalizing on a pre-existing or newly created anti-western sentiment. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Examples are legion, but let’s focus on a few of them. In 2009, during the annual meeting of FECRIS in Saint Petersburg, a speech was given by Belarusian FECRIS participant Vladimir A. Martinovich, about the political influence of “cults”. He started by identifying what he called the difference between “the simple desire to build up favorable opinion” and “the long term major ideological actions of the cults” going on to explain that in Belarus, with regards to the latter, “the largest action of this kind was organized by Pentecostals, Baptists and other Christian cults.”&nbsp; <em>(<a class="link" href="https://www.fecris.org/uncategorized/martinovich-en/ " rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Then he develops his theory by expressing the idea that the US have been focusing on International Religious Freedom, not to defend this freedom at all, but to gain political influence: “the ‘International Religious Freedom Act’, adopted in 1998 by the American congress, and the annual publications of the US Department of State about religious freedom in various countries of the world have influence on the politicisation of the cultist/sectarian problems on an international level. The human rights and religious organizations of the whole world collect material about real and invented cases of suppression of religious minorities for the preparation of the publication of the US Department of State. There are some reasons to doubt that the fate of those minorities is of real interest for the authors of that publication. (…) In agreement with the results of research, the conclusion can be drawn that violations of rights of religious minorities may be used as an occasion for political pressure by one country on another.” <br />  &nbsp; <br />  Another FECRIS speaker that very same day was German Pastor Thomas Gandow, cult counsellor of the Protestant church of Berlin-Brandenburg, and head of a German counter-cult group. He called his presentation “Cults or foreign lobbying groups?” and echoed Martinovich briefing, saying that “in the USA a whole series of governmental commissions are busy enforcing the US concept of ‘religious freedom’ and the lobbying activity for US organizations in the world.” That in itself, adds Gandow, justifies the need for FECRIS to engage in political activities (while in its bylaws, FECRIS affirms that it never does so): “Because the lobbying against cults towards politicians, authorities, scientists and even sometimes churches may be successful, it is important that FECRIS and its associations participate in the political opinion forming of our societies.” <em>(<a class="link" href="https://www.fecris.org/uncategorized/gandow-en/" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  So when Dvorkin, in May 2020, took the floor at the most important Russian Orthodox gathering of the year, the XXIX International Educational Readings, organized by the “Missionary Service of the Russian Orthodox Church” and under the patronage of Patriarch Kirill, he does not feel unsupported when he attacks the West for its “anti-Orthodoxy agenda”: “As for the actions directed specifically against Russia, this is where a very important event took place over the past year: on February 5, 2020, the United States Department of State officially announced the creation of the "International Religious Freedom Alliance". (…) This is an organization that, apparently, is largely directed against Orthodoxy in general and against Russia in particular. (…) Among the countries that have joined this alliance, if alphabetically, the first is Albania, the last is Ukraine. There are very few Western European countries on the list: first of all, these are the countries of the former Soviet Union, the former socialist camp, and, well, Greece, which obviously had its arms twisted and was forced to join, all these countries make up two-thirds of the members of this alliance. It is quite obvious that this is to create a ‘cordon sanitaire’ around our borders and, of course, it is an instrument of pressure on Russia, and an instrument of pressure on Orthodoxy.” <em>(<a class="link" href="https://iriney.ru/sektyi-i-kultyi/sektovedenie/novosti-sektovedeniya/privetstvennoe-slovo-i-obzor-sobyitij-za-2020-god.-prof.-a.l.-dvorkin.html" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> For Dvorkin, the International Religious Freedom Alliance was made to attack the Orthodox world, and the presence of Ukraine was not a coincidence.
     </div>
     <br style="clear:both;"/>
     <div style="position:relative; float:left; padding-right: 1ex;">
      <img src="https://www.eifrf-articles.org/photo/art/default/63378883-45700242.jpg?v=1648543542" alt="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" title="Why FECRIS should be held responsible for its Russian members activities" />
     </div>
     <div>
      <strong>Support of Russian FECRIS and complicity by FECRIS</strong> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  In 2009, during the annual meeting of FECRIS in Saint-Petersburg, Dvorkin expressed gratitude to FECRIS for having endorsed and registered his association: “In my country alone we have about thirty active and functioning cult research and information centers. We highly appreciate that document which gave much impetus to our young and not so much experienced organizations to work and to move forward. We felt that we are not alone and that the most sincere, responsible, honest, and wise people in Europe support our work and offer us to work together.” <em>(<a class="link" href="https://www.fecris.org/uncategorized/dvorkin-en/" rel="nofollow">Source</a>) </em>A few days later, answering to the Russian National News Agency, he added: "I regard this as a high level of trust, not only in me, but also in my Russian colleagues. The participation of a Russian representative in the leadership of an organization that is an official consultant to the Council of Europe raises the status of our country." <em>(<a class="link" href="http://ansobor.ru/news.php?news_id=355" rel="nofollow">Source</a>)</em> <br />  &nbsp; <br />  That support in itself, which has continued until today, is enough to conclude that FECRIS has been contributing to the outrageous actions of its Russian members. Throughout these years, FECRIS has been warned and alerted about the anti-Western propaganda of its Russian members, as well as about the fierce oppression that they were orchestrating against minority religions in post-soviet states. They did nothing. In 2012, a book was written which included a full chapter on Russian FECRIS and its links with the extremists of the Russian Orthodox Church and the power in place. FECRIS did nothing about it, and continued its support. Since 2014, numerous articles have been written to denounce the role of Dvorkin in participating to the Kremlin’s propaganda against the West, Ukraine, and religious minorities. FECRIS did nothing about it. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  More than that, they reelected Dvorkin as a Vice-President in 2018, showing their full support of his actions. To this very date, one month after the Russian invasion of Ukraine started, and after thousands of civilians have lost their lives, Dvorkin has not been removed from the FECRIS board of directors nor his actions condemned, and the Russian FECRIS associations that appear in this very article are still listed as genuine FECRIS members and correspondents on the FECRIS website. <br />  &nbsp; <br />  A few days after an article was published in the European Times, called “How the anti-cult movement has participated to fuel Russian anti-Ukraine rhetoric”, which mentioned FECRIS as being behind Dvorkin’s participation to the Kremlin’s propaganda, FECRIS felt compelled to publish on their website a timid statement “to join in the condemnation of the Russian military aggression against the Ukrainian population and legitimate authorities”. This is nothing less than a pathetic attempt to absolve itself of its own responsibility.
     </div>
     <br style="clear:both;"/>
   ]]>
   </description>
   <photo:imgsrc>https://www.eifrf-articles.org/photo/art/imagette/63378883-45700200.jpg</photo:imgsrc>
   <link>https://www.eifrf-articles.org/Why-FECRIS-should-be-held-responsible-for-its-Russian-members-activities_a238.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:https://www.eifrf-articles.org,2026:rss-26108672</guid>
   <title>St Petersburg Conference on Religious life of Russian regions and prevention of religious extremism - Speech by Marco Ventura</title>
   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 09:40:00 +0200</pubDate>
   <dc:language>us</dc:language>
   <dc:creator>EIFRF</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject><![CDATA[Events]]></dc:subject>
   <description>
   <![CDATA[
   Professor Marco Ventura is the Director of the Centre for Religious Studies at Bruno Kessler Foundation, full professor with tenure at the Department of Law of the University of Siena and member of the experts panel on Freedom of Religion of the OSCE. On October 2, he intervened at the conference "Religious life of Russian regions and prevention of religious extremism", which took place in St Petersburg, Russia. The conference was organized by the Russian Association of Religion Researchers (RARR), the Russian association of religious freedom (St. Petersburg office), the Educational scientific center of studying of religions of the Russian State Humanitarian University (Moscow), the St. Petersburg center of theological researches and the Research center of theological and ethnopolitical researches of the Leningrad State University of A.S. Pushkin. EIFRF participated to the conference. Here is the content of Marco Ventura's speech:     <div style="position:relative; text-align : center; padding-bottom: 1em;">
      <img src="https://www.eifrf-articles.org/photo/art/default/26108672-27008455.jpg?v=1645640048" alt="St Petersburg Conference on Religious life of Russian regions and prevention of religious extremism - Speech by Marco Ventura" title="St Petersburg Conference on Religious life of Russian regions and prevention of religious extremism - Speech by Marco Ventura" />
     </div>
     <div>
      <div style="text-align: center;"><strong>Freedom of Religion or Belief in the OSCE Region</strong></div>    <div style="text-align: center;"><strong>The Value and Rights of Minority Believers</strong></div>    <div>&nbsp;</div>    <div style="text-align: center;">International Scientific and Practical Conference</div>    <div style="text-align: center;">“Religious life of Russian regions and prevention of religious extremism”</div>    <div style="text-align: center;">St Petersburg</div>    <div style="text-align: center;">2 October 2018</div>    <div>&nbsp;</div>    <div><strong><em>Introduction</em></strong></div>    <div><strong><em>1. European minority believers</em></strong></div>    <div><strong><em>2. Their value</em></strong></div>    <div><strong><em>3. Their rights</em></strong></div>    <div><strong><em>Conclusion</em></strong></div>    <div>&nbsp;</div>    <div style="text-align: center;"><u><strong>Introduction</strong></u> <br />  &nbsp;</div>    <div>This presentation is concerned with minority believers and their freedom in the OSCE region and more specifically with extremism-based or tradition-based limitations of minorities’ freedom. For the purpose of this presentation Four factors combine in making majorities anxious about religious or belief minority individuals and their communities. First, global cultural exchange and transformation are resented as threatening identities and traditions. Second, global politics challenge national sovereignty in general and the extent and efficiency of domestic rule, thus questioning human rights as universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated, and hindering the transition to a viable combination of supranational and national/local governance and justice. Third, crisis in the economy and security encourages stigmatisation of minorities as responsible for the crisis and as an obstacle to peace and development. Fourth, innovation in science and technology, most of all in information technology and artificial intelligence, empowers majorities to an unprecedented degree, while increasing their concern that digital communication will make minorities more connected internationally and thus more powerful. The Wall Street Journal has recently denounced the pervasive use by local authorities of technologies of facial recognition and scanning in the Chinese autonomous region of Xinjiang, resulting in the worrying oppression of Muslim Uyghurs.</div>    <div>Against this background, I will argue first that religious or belief minorities represent a crucial value for the OSCE region, to be acknowledged, protected and promoted, and second that inherent and instrumental to such value are minority rights, both general and freedom of religion or belief specific. I will then conclude on the interdependence of the value and rights of minorities in Europe. <br />  &nbsp;</div>    <div style="text-align: center;"><u><strong>1. Minority believers in Europe.</strong></u> <br />  &nbsp;</div>    <div>We have celebrated this year the 25th anniversary of the European Court of Human Rights Kokkinakis decision of 1993, the first ever whereby a State signatory of the European Convention of Human Rights has been found in violation of article 9 ECHR. In the decision, judges made the following seminal point applicable to both our national communities and our transnational community: ‘as enshrined in Article 9, freedom of thought, conscience and religion is one of the foundations of a "democratic society" within the meaning of the Convention. It is, in its religious dimension, one of the most vital elements that go to make up the identity of believers and their conception of life, but it is also a precious asset for atheists, agnostics, sceptics and the unconcerned. The pluralism indissociable from a democratic society, which has been dearly won over the centuries, depends on it&nbsp;(ECtHR, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 1993, at para 31). This text, and the related principle, capture the historical and conceptual dimension of freedom of religion or belief for all in Europe. Historically, and descriptively, the very identity of Europe as well as of its national and local components is based on pluralism of religion or belief in a democratic society. Conceptually, and prescriptively, no democratic society can exist, if one of its foundations, freedom of religion or belief, is not granted to all. As a consequence, minority believers are to be understood as an indispensable part of the European equation, historically and conceptually, descriptively and prescriptively.</div>    <div>&nbsp;</div>    <div style="text-align: center;"><u><strong>2. Their value.</strong></u></div>    <blockquote>  <div style="text-align: center;">The value of minorities is not limited to some of them, but extends to all, big and small, more or less widespread, old or new. Orthodox Christians of the various Patriarchates and autocephalous churches, pre-Calcedonian churches, Roman Catholics and Protestants, Jewish of different schools, Sunni and Shia, Ahmadi and Alevi, Buddhists and Hindus of various traditions, Sikh and Baha’is belong to the same European symphony, as do Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses, Baptists and Adventists, Scientologists and Pentecostals. All have been recognised by European institutions, and the Court of Strasbourg.</div>  </blockquote>    <div>Minority believers and their communities represent a crucial value for Europe as understood in the European Convention of human rights and other international and pan-European instruments, on two accounts. First, they are indispensable to a plural, diverse and dynamic European society. Second, they are necessary to a rich and flourishing religious environment. On both accounts, the value of minorities is not limited to some of them, but extends to all, big and small, more or less widespread, old or new. Orthodox Christians of the various Patriarchates and autocephalous churches, pre-Calcedonian churches, Roman Catholics and Protestants, Jewish of different schools, Sunni and Shia, Ahmadi and Alevi, Buddhists and Hindus of various traditions, Sikh and Baha’is belong to the same European symphony, as do Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses, Baptists and Adventists, Scientologists and Pentecostals. All have been recognised by European institutions, and the Court of Strasbourg. In the European perspective, the value of minorities is inextricably linked to the value of majorities, since all majorities in a given land are minorities elsewhere. From such values follows a process of mutual learning. Minorities invite majorities to recognise and welcome their own internal diversity and the diversity of society. Majorities invite minorities to contribute to the common good and the harmony of society. The ultimate value of minority believers is thus that in multiple ways they are precious, and indispensable actors of renewal, witnessing and contributing to the capacity of the individuals and communities in the OSCE region to perpetuate traditions and identities through a sensible process of cultural and religious change. Such renewal is not only compatible with religious traditions, but is a peculiar contribution of them, based as it is on a careful, gradual, incremental process of change balancing traditions and modernity. In fact, such renewal turns out to be an inspiration for our innovation-driven society, whereas majority and minority believers together have a lot to contribute to how to best draw the line between good and bad change, desirable and undesirable change. <br />  &nbsp;</div>    <div style="text-align: center;"><strong><u>3. Their rights.</u></strong> <br />  &nbsp;</div>    <div>Minority believers do have rights, individual, collective and institutional. Some rights are not specific to religion or belief. Belonging to this category is the right not to be limited in the personal freedom, private life and property without an objective and strict justification according to the terms of international law in general and the European Convention of Human Rights in particular. Defence rights and the right to a fair trial are also crucial rights for minority believers. Some rights are indeed specific to freedom of religion or belief as a multi-faceted human right embracing individual, collective, institutional, educative and communicative dimensions. Such right is expressly recognized in international and regional standards and OSCE commitments. Freedom of religion or belief is a right belonging to all human beings, men and women, whether theistic, non-theistic, atheistic or other believers. It includes the freedom of everyone to manifest their religion or belief, individually or in community with others, in public or in private, through worship, teaching, practice and observance. Under international law, “security” or “national security” is not recognized as a permissible ground for restricting the manifestation of freedom of religion or belief. Under freedom of religion or belief, communities are protected against targeting, discrimination and persecution. In particular religious or belief communities can not be declared criminal organizations and outlawed simply because of the criminal conviction of one or more members; more generally, States should not sanction religious or belief communities for the criminal conduct of individuals or groups, or target individuals or groups because of their religion or belief, but should address the specific unlawful activity of individuals or groups. Also States sanction religious or belief communities by reference to concepts such as “extremism” or “radicalization” which, given their imprecise nature and lack of a commonly accepted definition, render them open to different interpretations and arbitrariness in their application. The legal prohibition and sanctioning of activities carried out by unregistered religious or belief communities is also incompatible with international standards and OSCE commitments.</div>    <div>&nbsp;</div>    <div style="text-align: center;"><u><strong>Conclusion</strong></u> <br />  &nbsp;</div>    <div>The correlation between rights and value is not one of hierarchy, or priority. Minority believers do not possess rights because of and insofar as they have value. Rights are inherent to them. Rather the correlation between value and rights should be seen as one of mutual enrichment and strengthening. This is all the more key, and relevant, for traditional majorities in our respective countries. Whenever and wherever minority believers are denied acknowledgment of their value and protection of their rights, it is the very essence of what means to be European to be at risk, and the very legacy of what Europeans, and European nations and peoples conquered over the centuries.</div>    <div>&nbsp;</div>  
     </div>
     <br style="clear:both;"/>
   ]]>
   </description>
   <photo:imgsrc>https://www.eifrf-articles.org/photo/art/imagette/26108672-27008455.jpg</photo:imgsrc>
   <link>https://www.eifrf-articles.org/St-Petersburg-Conference-on-Religious-life-of-Russian-regions-and-prevention-of-religious-extremism-Speech-by-Marco_a228.html</link>
  </item>

 </channel>
</rss>
